<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Jane 2.0 ?!?!?</title>
        <link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/topic/8022/t/Jane-2-0-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ pics have been released of what appears to be the body for the new Hasbro SDCC movie baroness...





interesting....


it would be cool to see this body start showing up on hasbro figures in retail stores...


 ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:41:56 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57472/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m glad to see Hasbro dusting off the Jane body. It doesn&#39;t matter whether it&#39;s a .8 or a 5.0, I&#39;m glad to see them investing a little more in
this design! From the looks of this figure, it&#39;s way too early to make conclusions about what color the body will be molded in, much less about the head
design. The neck design doesn&#39;t necessarily mean a significant loss of articulation; especially for some gain in aesthetics. I have to agree with Scott
about the elbow and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (onesixthwarrior)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57472</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57470/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57470</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the pic, Auret...definitely not one for the body bashers around here, but I still want to try and get one of these. I&#39;m surprised they changed
it at all to be honest, really going for a more vampy silhoutte. I&#39;ll get this, just because it&#39;s hasbro&#39;s first foray into a 12&quot; version of
an iconic RAH character. Too bad about the simplified neck articulation...that&#39;s the tradeoff for new body tooling, I guess? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (etmcneal)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57470</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57453/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57453</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ With no apparent upgrades to the 10 year old classic collection, single hinged elbows and knees, this prototype figure is far behind the articulation times.
<br>
<br>
The delta from classic Jane seems to be to lose the neck articulation, move the waist articulation up, and change the hands and feet. To me, that&#39;s a net
loss of poseability over the classic Jane.
<br>
<br>
The only company doing _less_ articulation is Mattel with their Babs &amp; Friends lines.
<br>
<br>
Then again, Hasbro... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (HoloSuite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57453</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57452/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57452</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ the torso probably won&#39;t be black... this picture is of a &quot;first shot&quot; prototype... they are often molded in weird colors... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (auret7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57452</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57444/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57444</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Island Of Toys wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  20 bucks says they mold the torso in black plastic like that ,so the doll can&#39;t be &quot;naked&quot; and offend anyone&#39;s delicate sensibilities...
  <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif" alt="image">
</blockquote>
<br>
That would not surprise me whatsoever.  Mattel now molds panties on their fashion dolls ( in skin tone ), so this would not be far fetched. <img... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Trogdor)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57444</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57443/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57443</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I agree with Tonzez; and oh man Island, I hope they don&#39;t mold the torso in black. Yech. -Omar ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (actionman81)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57443</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57439/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57439</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If only we can get our hands on them for $20.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tonzez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57439</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57438/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57438</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If only we can get our hands on them for $20.00 or less!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tonzez)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57438</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:26:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57437/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57437</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 20 bucks says they mold the torso in black plastic like that ,so the doll can&#39;t be &quot;naked&quot; and offend anyone&#39;s delicate sensibilities... <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Island Of Toys)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57437</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57436/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57436</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well I give Hasbro credit for trying,....but I&#39;m not too sure this is a step ahead. I don&#39;t mind the torso change, looks nice, however I&#39;m not
thrilled with less articulation in the neck. Yes that head suffers from the Sideshow Syndrome..looks way out of scale. Hard, molded hair will also limit
whatever little articulation there was in the neck I&#39;m afraid. Also the hip area is suffering. I can see using existing molds and all for the legs, but
thats a huge space around the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ffolkes75)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57436</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:50:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57431/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57431</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ non-poseable neck? I take it back.. It&#39;s Jane 0.8. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (HoloSuite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57431</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:39:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57430/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57430</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ i think the fact that it has an entirely new torso, hands, and a different neck assembly constitutes calling it a 2.0 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (auret7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57430</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:35:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57429/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 2.0?   1.2, maybe.  Looks like the only significant change from trusty &#39;ol Jane is the change from the abdominal ball joint to an upper torso joint.
<br>
<br>
Here&#39;s the inside story on the classic collection Jane frame.
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/jpeg/d2a25f045582547529447efd75e90a09a39b246.jpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
And something a bit less transparent.
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/jpeg/40e257048a8d64c22a5462826aefa9211d7ca21.jpg"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (HoloSuite)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57429</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:13:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57428/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57428</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ as always from claves down uglu legs and ugly arms massive head but everything else is...ok ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kal El Klarc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57428</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:58:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/reply/57427/t/Jane-2-0-.html#reply-57427</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ doesn&#39;t the head seem a little too big?
<br>
<br>
<img height="15" src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/ohwell.gif" width="15" alt="image">
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sniper joe)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/sreply/57427</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:45:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Jane 2.0 ?!?!? ]]></title>
			<link>http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/topic/8022/t/Jane-2-0-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ pics have been released of what appears to be the body for the new Hasbro SDCC movie baroness...
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v53/auret/figures/03.jpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
interesting....
<br>
<br>
it would be cool to see this body start showing up on hasbro figures in retail stores...
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (auret7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://menwithdolls.yuku.com/topic/8022</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:41:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>